Note: I realize this post is excessively long, but I
encourage everyone who’s interested in AdTeam/Advertising/NSAC/my life (hi,
friends) to read on.
The National Student Advertising Competition is an annual
competition for college students in the advertising industry. Each year, a
big-name brand sponsors the competition and challenges students to create an
integrated advertising campaign to help grow their brand. Past sponsors have
included JCPenney, State Farm, Coca-Cola, and AOL. This year’s sponsor was the
Japanese carmaker Nissan. Nissan asked students from around the nation to
create a campaign to help build top-of-mind awareness among African American,
Hispanic, and Chinese millennials (ages 18-29). This competition is the most
real-to-life experience an advertising student can gain during their college
career (apart from internships). They have to dig in to research, find that key
insight, and turn that insight into a big idea. Each team creates a 32-page
plans book including research highlights, campaign objectives, creative
executions, promotions and sponsorships, social media strategies, and a media
plan. The teams then have to present their campaign to a panel of judges at the
regional competition. Teams who win their district continue on to the national
competition, where sixteen teams present their ideas in hopes of taking home
the winning title.
I’ve competed at NSAC for the last two years, and I can say
there’s no experience quite like it. It’s made me a better person, and it’s
definitely made me a better marketer. Along with experience of applying what
you’ve learned during school to create a campaign, you also get to learn about
the tides of the industry. You feel the pride in coming up with a great idea,
the anxiety of presenting it, and in many cases you feel the sting of the
client’s rejection. Think Hunger Games: There can only be one winner.
This year, Drury’s team found a one-of-a-kind insight. You
know, the ones that are so simple and undeniable that you can’t believe someone
hasn’t realized it before. Like Dove’s “real beauty comes in all shapes and
sizes”. This bit of research grew into a solid, wonderfully creative campaign.
It made sense. And we knew it would make sense to the audience. Most of the
time in the ad world, you come to a client with two ideas: One that you know
they’ll be comfortable with and one that you know will push them outside their
comfort zone. Usually, you know the latter is the right choice to help grow
their brand, and usually, they pick the former. Well, our team didn’t want to
ignore this insight. We decided it was worth it to take the risk, to show
Nissan something they wouldn’t be completely comfortable with, because we knew
that this insight and this idea would do what they asked: increase top-of-mind
awareness and grow their brand.
That’s why we were so surprised when we started watching the
District 9 presentations. The majority of schools competing decided to continue
with Nissan’s current Innovation for All
campaign. It was like watching the same idea over, and over, and over again. If
Nissan came to us with a problem, why would they want us to solve it with the
same campaign they’ve been running—the campaign that obviously hasn’t helped
them (and is the reason they sponsored this competition to begin with)? And the
hardest part was that these were the teams that won the competition.
I believe that it is our job as marketers to present the
client with new ideas—with ideas that will break through the clutter with
relevant messaging. Ideas that will resonate with the target and create
goodwill toward the company. It’s not our job to be people pleasers. It’s our
job to find out what’s real to the audience, what means something to them,
what’s something that hasn’t been tapped into or talked about, and it’s our job
to help our clients.
There are good clients and bad clients. Good clients love
their brand and will do everything they can to help it grow. Bad clients just
want more money, faster. But that’s not the way the world works. People don’t
buy cars on a snap decision. There is not a commercial in the world that could
convince someone to buy a car after one viewing. Buying a car is an emotional
process. You either have to convince the audience that you have something
different to offer or that you, as a company, are different. And you’re not
going to do either by claiming that touch-start technology, headroom, and color
customization are “innovative features”.
Rejection stings, but it’s a feeling that everyone in the
advertising industry should get used to. There will come a day when you’ll have
a great idea, an idea you believe in,
and an idea that makes sense from every angle you look at it. And that idea is
going to be ignored by the client because it isn’t what they want to hear. When
that happens, you have to remember that you did your job and you did what was right. And if you can look back and think,
“I wouldn’t change a thing,” you smile at yourself and be proud for standing up
for the right idea.
NSAC is an incredible experience, and one that’s invaluable
to advertising graduates, no matter the outcome. It teaches you the importance
of novel research, the rarity of a big idea, and how to handle the ups and
downs of the ad world.
So to Nissan and NSAC 2012, I say:
I wouldn’t change a thing.